Classic and Contemporary Poetry: Explained

Robert Creeley’s "Money" is a reflective and introspective poem that explores the relationship between desire, material wealth, and personal fulfillment. The poem's minimalist language and fragmented structure mirror the tension between wanting more and never feeling satisfied, raising questions about the value of possessions and the elusive nature of contentment. As the speaker grapples with the complexities of materialism, the poem subtly critiques the capitalist drive for acquisition while reflecting on the personal cost of such desires.

The opening line, "Stand up, heart, and take it," is a direct command to the speaker’s own heart, urging it to seize what is desired. The use of "heart" in this context suggests an emotional or instinctual drive for something—perhaps wealth, power, or freedom. The imperative "take it" speaks to the societal pressure to pursue and claim what one wants, no matter the emotional or moral consequences. The heart, symbolizing both desire and vulnerability, is positioned as the force that must stand up and act. This sets the stage for a poem that will explore the tension between yearning for more and the deeper consequences of fulfilling that desire.

The image of the "Boat tugs at mooring" introduces a metaphor for the desire to break free or move forward. The boat, anchored at its mooring, represents a desire for escape or adventure, but it is still tied down, unable to fully set sail. This tension between the urge to move and the restraint of being anchored mirrors the speaker’s internal conflict about material wealth and desire. The repetition of "Just a little later, a little later" conveys a sense of procrastination or delay, as if the speaker is constantly putting off the moment of action or decision. This phrase suggests that there is always more time, or another chance, to achieve what is desired—yet the hesitation persists.

The line "More you wanted, more you got" succinctly captures the cycle of desire and acquisition that drives much of the poem. The speaker acknowledges that the pursuit of material wealth or possessions often leads to obtaining more than one originally sought, but this accumulation does not necessarily bring satisfaction. The phrase speaks to the insatiable nature of human desire, where each fulfillment only leads to further craving. This endless cycle of wanting and receiving is central to the poem’s meditation on the hollowness of material wealth.

The line "The shock of recognition, like they say, better than digitalis" introduces a moment of self-awareness or realization. "Digitalis" is a medication used to treat heart conditions, and its mention here suggests that the "shock of recognition"—the sudden understanding of a deeper truth—is more powerful or effective than any physical remedy. This recognition likely refers to the speaker’s awareness of the futility of chasing after material wealth, yet this understanding, though shocking, does not prevent the speaker from continuing to desire more.

The rhetorical question, "You want that sailboat sailing by?" underscores the theme of desire, as the speaker contemplates whether they truly want what they see—whether they truly desire the freedom and luxury represented by the sailboat. The next line, "Reach out and take it if you can, if you must," reinforces the idea that material wealth is within reach, but it comes with a caveat. The phrase "if you can, if you must" suggests that even though one might have the ability to claim material goods, the question remains whether it is necessary or even desirable to do so. This tension between capability and necessity highlights the speaker’s ambivalence about material pursuits.

The speaker then shifts to a more self-reflective tone: "You talk a lot to yourself / about what you don’t want / these days, adding up figures, costs." This line captures the internal dialogue that accompanies the speaker’s contemplation of wealth and desire. The speaker is preoccupied with the things they no longer want, or perhaps never truly needed, and this internal reckoning involves "adding up figures, costs." This phrase reflects both the literal counting of money and the more abstract calculation of the personal and emotional costs of pursuing material wealth. The speaker’s introspection reveals a sense of dissatisfaction or disillusionment with the pursuit of wealth.

The poem concludes with the setting: "Here in the rented house on the water / for the proverbial two months, / it’s still not enough." The speaker finds themselves in a "rented house on the water," a place that might symbolize luxury or temporary escape, but it is clear that even this privileged setting does not bring fulfillment. The mention of the "proverbial two months" suggests a cliché of affluence—the idea of renting a house by the water as a symbol of success or leisure—yet even this experience is insufficient. The final line, "it’s still not enough," encapsulates the central theme of the poem: no matter how much one accumulates or achieves materially, it is never truly satisfying. The sense of incompleteness persists, leaving the speaker with an unresolved tension between their desires and the reality of their emotional emptiness.

Structurally, "Money" follows Creeley’s characteristic use of short, enjambed lines that create a sense of fragmentation and immediacy. The poem’s sparse language mirrors the speaker’s internal struggle with desire and the futility of materialism. The repetition of certain phrases, such as "a little later" and "more you wanted, more you got," reinforces the cyclical nature of desire and the speaker’s inability to break free from the pattern of wanting more.

Thematically, the poem explores the emptiness of material wealth and the insatiable nature of human desire. The speaker’s self-reflective tone suggests an awareness of the futility of pursuing more, yet they remain trapped in the cycle of accumulation. The rented house by the water serves as a symbol of temporary luxury and the fleeting satisfaction that comes with material success, but ultimately, it leaves the speaker feeling unfulfilled.

In conclusion, Robert Creeley’s "Money" is a reflective meditation on the tension between material desire and personal fulfillment. Through minimalist language and fragmented structure, the poem captures the speaker’s internal struggle with the insatiable nature of wanting more and the ultimate futility of material wealth. The poem’s exploration of desire, accumulation, and dissatisfaction offers a critique of the capitalist drive for more, while also acknowledging the personal cost of such pursuits. Ultimately, "Money" invites readers to reflect on their own relationship with wealth, desire, and the elusive nature of contentment.

Copyright (c) 2025 PoetryExplorer

Discover our Poem Explanations and Poet Analyses!

Other Poems of Interest...